« Vandals Interested in Politics at Michigan's Petoskey Public Library. | Main | King's out, Cormier's in. »

08 February 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345169e469e200d83517301669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SDQ Interview with Adam Selzer.:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

danielle

re: your pet peeve. See my recent blog entry about "for all intensive purposes"; I fully attribute these types of grammatical gaffes to our society's penchant for hearing rather than reading. Most of what I know about grammar comes from reading a lot, not from being taught in school. "Should of" makes perfect sense if you don't read enough to know it's really just a contraction.

"should of" and "could of" is one of my biggest pet peeves too. :-)

danielle

Oops, I guess it's Selzer's pet peeve. But my previous comment still holds true.

Caroline

I've been creeped out by mirrors in darkened rooms for years. No matter how many times I tell myself it's the dumbest thing ever, I have to avert my eyes and flee.

Nancy

"could of" is horrible horrible stuff

ellie

Bloody Mary is my irrational fear too. I was just posting about that myself.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Support My Habit

Index-o-rama.

GA

Blog powered by Typepad