There's a sequel to Stargirl coming out in August.
And somehow, even though I had HUGE issues with the first one -- like, so huge that I almost hated the book** -- I'm kind of excited to read the sequel. I'm curious. I want to hear Stargirl's voice. Will it make me like her? Or will it make me want, even more than ever, to punch her in the face?
I'm just so confused.
*That's a Ken Miller quote. You know, Seth Rogen's character on Freaks and Geeks.
**Well, I hated the title character. The story itself, I liked -- especially the resolution. (Because it was realistic, I mean. Not because it was over.)



Oooh, my goodness. You have spoken HERESY aloud! We are ALL supposed to LOVE this book!
Actually, I'm really grateful I'm not the only one that felt like, "Geez, could she have just tried to blend in a little?" and then felt evil because of course, NO ONE should HAVE to TRY to be anything other than their dear little self in high school... at least that's what we were told; reality tends to be somewhat different... She just irritated me SO MUCH.
I do hope we like her better. Maybe hearing her 'voice' not through the eyes of a boy will help...
Posted by: TadMack | 08 May 2007 at 04:11 PM
It's Spinelli. I had the same reaction to the ending of "eggs." It was so satisfyingly real, but gosh, getting through the crazy friendship of those two ... so real it hurt? I don't know. Curious about this one as well. Has another author done the whole title-is-really-a-picture deal?
Posted by: bryn @ brio | 08 May 2007 at 05:04 PM
"I can't wait to read this so I can tell whether I want to punch the MC in the face" is an odd sort of endorsement.
Posted by: Kelly Fineman | 08 May 2007 at 09:52 PM
I wasn't a big fan of Stargirl either. Give me Maniac Magee any day.
Posted by: Little Willow | 08 May 2007 at 11:54 PM
I thought I was the only one who didn't looooove Stargirl! That character irked me too-- I know it's based on his wife, and for all I know she may be a perfectly lovely person, but the way it was written just...ohh... I have to think about it some more to remember exactly why it bothered me so. It's been a while.
Posted by: bookbk | 09 May 2007 at 01:44 PM
Oh dear. I had no idea that the character was based on his wife. Now I feel slightly guilty.
But only slightly.
Posted by: Leila | 09 May 2007 at 02:00 PM
I'm not supposed to say what I think of books, but...I hate this book. One of my least favorite YA books ever, for the reason you say.
But teens seem to love it, I'll say that.
Posted by: Brent Hartinger | 09 May 2007 at 02:36 PM
I'll admit, most of my joy from this title came from the fact that I listened to the audio version...read by John Ritter. Who did a weirdly fantastic job. I'm kind of sad he's not here to read the second one for me.
Posted by: Nonanon | 09 May 2007 at 10:51 PM
I'm going to put myself out there, but I absolutely LOVED Stargirl when I read it. Partly because she was so unique and partly because she was happy with herself for being different. I also loved the message that the book portrayed. During the tumultuous existence that is high school, it's OK to be yourself, even when the world hates you for it. I think that there needs to be more books that send that message, rather than the "Gossip Girl" and "Clique" type books that tell girls to be a certain way, or else. Am I too innocent for my own good?
Posted by: Faithful Reader from Canada | 09 May 2007 at 11:55 PM
FRfC: As far as I know, you're in the majority on this one! And of course I agree that "Be Yourself" is a great message -- I just couldn't stand the character.
Nonanon: As strong as my feelings are about the book, a John Ritter audiobook is so very tempting. He was so awesome.
Posted by: Leila | 10 May 2007 at 06:31 AM
Loved the cover though.
BlueRectangle Books
Posted by: Sylvia | 10 May 2007 at 06:33 AM
Rest in peace, John Ritter. I kind of whimper every time I see a Clifford cartoon, because John supplied the voice. I would have liked to have worked with the man. Great comedian. Great sense of timing, improv, and space.
Posted by: Little Willow | 13 May 2007 at 09:14 PM