Silly me, I didn't know how he could possibly get people more revved up than he did with the His Dark Materials trilogy.
But I was obviously not thinking big enough: his new book, a re-telling of the life of Jesus that challenges the gospels, will be called The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ.
But then, maybe since it's a book geared to adults, it won't be controversial.
Maybe.
Oh, who am I kidding? Philip Pullman can't blow his nose without being controversial.

I heart Philip Pullman so much it almost hurts. This is going to be so good!!!!
Posted by: dani | 09 September 2009 at 07:38 AM
Maybe that'll be the name of his autobiography: SCANDALOUS BOOGERS.
Posted by: Brian F. | 09 September 2009 at 09:51 AM
Can I confess that I get a little tired of it? So much of the time it seems to me that he's doing it for the controversy. But maybe that's me being ticklish and jaded.
Posted by: Maureen E | 09 September 2009 at 12:06 PM
Eh, I feel similarly. It seems to me that he often lets his agenda take over his story and push it out of shape. I did get a kick out of watching people fuss about Harry Potter for years, never noticing that His Dark Materials was being published. It was like they only read books that were being made into movies.
Posted by: dangermom | 09 September 2009 at 04:04 PM
I agree with dangermom on all counts-- probably would have written the exact same thing if she hadn't first.
Posted by: rockinlibrarian | 09 September 2009 at 07:07 PM
Maureen, I don't think it's at all strange. I don't think he does it only for the controversy, but I certainly don't think he minds it -- and I do think that he might secretly like winding people up.
And dangermom, yes -- I also thought it was funny that so many people who were so concerned about HP being satanic or whatever never noticed His Dark Materials until the movie came out.
Posted by: Leila | 09 September 2009 at 08:17 PM
I dunno, maybe I'm just in a cynical mood this morning, but reading the article makes me think "...and Philip Pullman jumps the shark." Is he turning into a one-trick pony? That would be a bummer, I've always enjoyed his writing.
Posted by: dangermom | 10 September 2009 at 12:00 PM
Gee, Philip, way to be original. That theory has only been around for, oh, I don't know, CENTURIES.
Posted by: Gina | 12 September 2009 at 06:41 PM
Original or not, I will certainly be checking it out when it's on shelves. Pullman doesn't need to reinvent the wheel, only spin a good yard, at which he is exceedingly efficient.
Posted by: Rabid | 14 September 2009 at 11:47 AM