« Kate Flaim on Elizabeth Peters. | Main | Capital Portraits. »
From the News-Leader:
“The committee voted unanimously to keep the book on the shelves with no restrictions,” Ritchie said.
Ritchie said that the committee did discuss the possibility of being more proactive about informing parents that they can place their own restrictions on what their children can access in the library.
|
| | |
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345169e469e2017d417d2619970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Update on the challenge to Intensely Alice.:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
"...the committee did discuss the possibility of being more proactive about informing parents that they can place their own restrictions on what their children can access in the library."
Yes. That would be called 'taking an active role in your child's life.' Or possibly 'regularly discussing what your child is reading, together.'
Posted by: Robin | 04 March 2013 at 07:47 PM
Can they be more proactive in getting rid of the principal?
Posted by: Hope | 04 March 2013 at 09:49 PM