Yeah, the book's beautiful, but what's up with the reviewer playing into stereotypes about female authors? It's one thing to claim that fiction by women isn't given an equal chance in the marketplace, but she's almost saying that that's OK. It makes me want to read the book to find out if the "muscular" prose and male leads are really the major features of the book, and if so, why focus as much on the author's name and gender as the quality of the text? If it's an Onion-style joke, I'm not sure it's funny.
I've read it and it MORE than lives up to the cover!
Posted by: rebecca | 30 August 2006 at 09:45 PM
I'm the type of person who has bought books for the cover and I'd definitely buy that one. Plus it sounds good.
Posted by: Katya | 30 August 2006 at 09:50 PM
Yeah, the book's beautiful, but what's up with the reviewer playing into stereotypes about female authors? It's one thing to claim that fiction by women isn't given an equal chance in the marketplace, but she's almost saying that that's OK. It makes me want to read the book to find out if the "muscular" prose and male leads are really the major features of the book, and if so, why focus as much on the author's name and gender as the quality of the text? If it's an Onion-style joke, I'm not sure it's funny.
Posted by: V. Vxn | 30 August 2006 at 10:07 PM
I agree wholeheartedly and its been on my list for awhile.
Posted by: Carl V. | 30 August 2006 at 10:51 PM
I loved Look At Me. I read it not knowing what it was, until later I suspected it was chick-lit. But it was still good.
Posted by: Adam | 31 August 2006 at 10:36 AM
I agree about the review, V. Vxn -- v. strange. And rather worrisome.
Hoping to read the book soon.
Posted by: Leila | 05 September 2006 at 11:47 AM