Tyler Miller has never been popular. He's a self-described "piece of drywall". Invisible. Boring.
But when he's caught for graffiting* the school -- five cans worth -- he gets some attention. And when he begins his senior year newly buff from his landscaping job (that he had to get to pay for the vandalism), he gets even more.
The most amazing thing about being noticed is who's doing the noticing: Bethany Milbury, the Queen Bee of George Washington High.
But, hoo boy. Chip Milbury, formerly Tyler's chief tormentor -- and Bethany's brother -- is not happy about it. Not happy at all.
After an especially wild party, Things Get Ugly.
Oh, and I haven't even mentioned his home life:
Miller men were disciplined. Miller men followed rules. Miller men toughed it out, they ate dirt and went for the kill.
That last one was a real quote. Dad said it to me when I was eleven, after I lost the Little League championship. The ball had been hit square to the shortstop and I took too much of a lead so I was trapped between third and home. Dad screamed for me to go, so I went, and I slid and was tagged by the catcher.
Grandpa Miller told Dad I was a pansy for not taking out the catcher's legs and I didn't want it bad enough and Dad agreed with him. Mom lost it in a very controlled way and told them they were both lunatics. She dragged me and Hannah home so I missed the team going for hot dogs after the game.
Yep. There's a whole lot going on here. It explores class, popularity, emotional and verbal abuse, sibling relationships, alcoholism, depression, friendship, various kinds of pressure and What It Means To Be A Man. All that and I think I'm missing one. At least one.
Tyler's relationship with his sister felt spot-on, as did the relationship between his parents. I found Bethany Milbury intriguing -- especially that in that one moment** -- but I thought that her brother was a bit of a moustache-twirler***.
I'd definitely give it to teen fans of Inexcusable and Breathing Underwater -- Twisted deals with similar themes, but Tyler walks the line that Keir and Nick both cross. He's more likable, and I think that will make the book a bit more accessible to a larger audience than the other two****.
*Yeah, I'm not too sure if that's actually a word, either. Work with me.
**SPOILER: When she almost walks into Tyler's ISS room. (Yes, it wasn't technically In-School Suspension, but it might as well have been.)
***You know. Two-dimensional villain. Though I do think that if LHA decided to write a book from Bethany's perspective, we'd see that there's more to Chip. Then again, maybe the guy is just a jerk.
****I mean, I personally think that Inexcusable is brilliant, but I've heard a lot of people (and not just teens) say that they couldn't finish it because they felt so strongly about Keir.
Oh yes, because only good looking guys who commit minor crimes in high school can be popular.
Posted by: Adam S. | 05 March 2007 at 10:09 PM
((can't read this post yet - this book is in my to-read pile))
Posted by: Little Willow | 05 March 2007 at 10:52 PM
You know I was really disappointed with this one - to the extent that I decided not to review it in my column. There were just too many cliches right from the beginning. The wimp, of course, gets big and buff over the summer, of course he has a crush on the rich pretty girl, of course her dad is his dad's boss, of course her brother is the big athlete/jerk, or course in the very beginning when he has a change to beat the jerk in an arm wrestling contest his father won't let him as it might embarass the boss - and on and on. It was too formulaic for me. I thought Tim Tharp's Knights of Hill Country about a conflicted football player was way better. (And it is reviwed in my April column!)
Posted by: Colleen | 06 March 2007 at 02:18 AM
Adam: Yep. The other guys who commit minor crimes in high school get put on the "Possible Future School Rampage Candidate" list. Although, in the book, he never really gets popular. Just... noticed.
Colleen: All totally, totally fair complaints. Chip, specifically, had a few lines that could have almost been originally delivered by The King of the Moustache-Twirlers, Hardy-Genns-with-TWO-ns*. It felt like it would made a better-than-average -- yet-still-cliche-ridden -- teen movie. I do still think that teen fans of the books I mentioned will enjoy it -- and I think that the accessibility factor that I mentioned may actually be enhanced by the cliches. It's a book that doesn't require any work on the part of the reader, yet still deals with lots and lots (and lots) of issues, so I could imagine it enjoying a bit more popularity than the Lynch. Anyway.
Were you expecting more because it was by LHA? Or had you heard really good things about it? I'll admit, the only LHA that I've really been blown away by is Speak**. I kind of hated Catalyst, though I read it so long ago that I'd probably have to re-read it to remember why. I liked Prom a lot, though. So my expectations weren't crazy high, which might have contributed to my lack of disappointment.
I HAVE GOT to read KoHC. I keep forgetting to snag a copy. Grrr. Thanks for the reminder!
*Name that movie!
**Which my sister hates because she thinks it is a big bag of cliches. There, Briana. Happy? I said it for you.
Posted by: Leila | 06 March 2007 at 07:10 AM
Oh, I forgot to mention...
Did you notice the "This is not a book for children" note at the beginning of the book? Is that A) a LHA thing, B) a Penguin thing, or C) a new-to-YA-books-in-the-hopes-of-staving-off-future-challenges thing? Interesting.
Posted by: Leila | 06 March 2007 at 09:00 AM
Yes, I am a fan of LHA. Yes, I think Speak wonderful. Fever, 1793, as well. No, I was not knocked over by Catalyst or Prom. I REALLY liked Twisted. I think it is the best she's written since Speak. Maybe some of the issues were cliched to some, but I think that sometimes, we need to remember that even the most hackneyed of cliches still have basis in reality - just b/c it's happened before doesn't mean it won't again, or that it's less true. Maybe I'm just overlooking things because Tyler was such a true character to me. I really identified with him. But then, his home life is familiar, so perhaps I'm too close to it. I won't hesitate to give this one away. That scene in his father's room was breath-taking - as I wrote when I posted about the book - I won't ever forget it. How often can we say that?
Posted by: Jackie | 08 March 2007 at 02:38 PM