From the prologue:
But let's get something straight: if, despite my warning, you insist on reading the book, you can't hold me responsible for the consequences.
And, make no bones about it, this is a very dangerous book.
No, it won't blow up in your face. Or bite your head off. Or tear you limb from limb.
It probably won't injure you at all. Unless somebody throws it at you, which is a possibility that should never be discounted.
Without giving too much away, The Name of This Book is Secret involves two eleven-year-old sleuths (one survivalist, one aspiring-but-not-very-good stand-up comedian), a pair of antique selling (though they can never bear to sell any, so antique hoarding would be more accurate) grandfathers, a secret room, the magic word, The Symphony of Smells, a magician, at least two mysterious fires, circus life, synesthesia, some shady glove-wearing characters and mint-chip ice cream.
It's an attractive book. The moment I pulled it out of the mailer, the shiny (but not TOO shiny), die cut cover (the hole is small enough, and without angles, so it shouldn't be too much of a pain for booksellers) forced me to sit down and flip through. Then there was the big "Warning: Do not read beyond this page!" page. And full-page illustrations at the beginning of every chapter -- and, speaking of chapters, chapter headings like, "Chapter Eight: The Title of this Chapter is So Alarming I've Decided Not To Include It".
Yes, it could all be described as gimmicky, but it could also be described as fun. It worked on me*. I bumped it to the top of my TBR pile.
You might want to try this one out on kids who are suffering from Series of Unfortunate Events withdrawal. It's significantly longer (I did think that it, like The Mysterious Benedict Society, dragged a bit in the middle), but it also features a snarky narrator who speaks directly to the reader**:
Have you ever been locked in a room hours away from home by people you have every reason to believe are capable of murder or worse?
Neither have I.
Maybe that's why I can write about it without shedding a tear.
I should mention that although narrators like this can certainly be funny (and this one is, quite often), for me, reading them almost always results in a total emotional disconnect from the characters. It definitely happened here.
Most of the Amazon reviewers compare the book to the Harry Potter series, which... doesn't really make any sense. Other than the fact that they're both thick books geared towards tweens, they don't really have anything in common. It did remind me of the books I've already mentioned (Unfortunate Events and Benedict Society), but also a bit of Ellen Raskin's books. (Though the Raskin books are much tighter and, well, just... better.) Though the book is enjoyable, the packaging and the advertising campaign are both more impressive.
If, at the end of the book, it hadn't been completely clear that this is the first in a series, I would have ended the book on a more positive note and I probably would have liked it more overall. But, what with the draggy bits and the added knowledge that it's going to KEEP GOING... my eyeballs started rolling around in my head. It felt like it was put together by a committee of people, and not actually, you know, written.
(That said, the About the Author was really funny.)
It seems that the more I think about it, the grouchier I'm getting. HOWEVER, like I said, I do think it would be worth a try on the Lemony Snicket kids. (Because, heck! I didn't really like the Snicket books either! Crab crab crab crab crab***.)
*Damn shiny covers. My magpie tendencies strike again.
**And who is constantly telling the reader to put the book down and walk away. Oh, and who uses footnotes. A lot.
***At least I made it all the way through this one. I made it through, what? One and a half Snickets?
Oh, and I forgot to mention -- there's a character, Amber, who is straight out of The Clique books (except nice, sort of). She even subscribes to a Glossip Girl-ish service.
I appreciated that.
Posted by: Leila | 26 October 2007 at 07:59 AM
Is there more than one Ellen Raskin book? I ask in all anticipation since The Westing Game is a book I reread at least once a year if not more often.
Posted by: tulip | 26 October 2007 at 08:39 AM
Interesting. I love the Snicket books and was turned off of this title simply because it seemed like a cheap knock-off of the series I loved so well. Plus, every single objection you had to it, I had too. There were little things I liked, but talk about an intrusive narrator! Now tell me what you think about "Alcatraz Verses the Evil Librarians".
Posted by: Fuse #8 | 26 October 2007 at 11:27 AM
Dude, I LOVED Alcatraz. Weird, right?
Posted by: Leila | 26 October 2007 at 05:49 PM
I find your taste in reading material to be much like my own. (Yay!)
Naw, I didn't like the Icity Snickity books. They put me off at once as I felt the author was being very gimmicky and that the books were written to be made into movies. (ugh, cheap move) I felt somewhat similar about the Spiderwick books, too, although I found the Spiderwick series much easier to read (stomach.)
Thanks for your terrific site. Very, very helpful, even though I think we have the same intuition about books.
Posted by: Teri | 24 January 2008 at 12:13 AM
this is the best book I've ever read...and I never like to read!!!!! I also can never put down the book!!!!!
Posted by: Morganne Neaville | 04 February 2008 at 07:59 PM
hi. i loved this book.does anyone know what book comes next in the series??
Posted by: anna | 13 August 2008 at 12:13 PM
the next book in the series is "if your reading this, it's too late" enjoy!
Posted by: | 29 November 2008 at 03:24 PM
i totally loved this book the other steps right in during the story to explain to you things you may not understand. i also love the way that he put an asterisk after a sentence he wanted to comment on and in smaller letters at the bottom of the page he told you his comment.
Posted by: | 29 November 2008 at 03:26 PM
oops *author not other
Posted by: | 29 November 2008 at 03:27 PM