1. I don't get the Lady Gaga thing at all.
2. I really don't get the "no pants" thing at all - and I wish someone would explain to me when looking this cheap became cool.
Lady Gaga is actually quite talented - why she has to protitute herself remains a mystery. But maybe Misrule's comment about women on the cover of Rolling Stone solves it. Women's equality in America...really?
My sister and I came to the conclusion that Lady Gaga has a severe allergy to pants. It's the only explanation.
Posted by: Nova16 | 28 June 2010 at 08:27 PM
Oh, Gaga. Blurg.
Posted by: nadine | 28 June 2010 at 08:30 PM
1. I don't get the Lady Gaga thing at all.
2. I really don't get the "no pants" thing at all - and I wish someone would explain to me when looking this cheap became cool.
Posted by: Colleen | 28 June 2010 at 08:31 PM
That right butt cheek is way photoshopped. And I love how small the type is on the "Obama's General" story is.
Posted by: Afton | 28 June 2010 at 09:23 PM
I don't think can recall a woman on a Rolling Stone cover where she weren't half nekkid.
Posted by: Misrule | 29 June 2010 at 08:25 AM
Wow ... if this does not perfectly illustrate Lacan's theories about psychoanalysis of film, then I don't know WHAT does. Wow. Just, wow.
Posted by: A Faithful Canadian Reader | 29 June 2010 at 11:41 PM
Lady Gaga is actually quite talented - why she has to protitute herself remains a mystery. But maybe Misrule's comment about women on the cover of Rolling Stone solves it. Women's equality in America...really?
Posted by: Arlene Allen | 30 June 2010 at 11:48 AM
I'm fuddy-duddying right along with you. Yuck.
Posted by: Gina | 04 July 2010 at 11:43 AM