bookshelves of doom

More footage from The Giver has been released...

...and yes, some of it is in black and white:

I'm still feeling EXTREMELY skeptical. It just looks way... flashier than I ever pictured the book.

Five Slightly More Plausible Dystopias...

...at Quirk Books:

IN A WORLD where the government regulates the temperature of microwaveable food so that no one burns their mouth on frozen burritos, one girl must fight for her family’s right to consume something other than lukewarm convenience foods.

“I don’t want my food to be safe, or still kind of icy in the middle,” I cried. “I want it to be burning hot and freezing cold. I want to singe the taste buds off my tongue and give myself incapacitating ice cream headaches whenever I eat a freeze pop.”
“You want to taste things the way they really are,” said the mysterious new boy in school.
“I want to live.”

AHAHAHAHA, "the mysterious new boy in school".

Hollywood SF and race.

At the Atlantic:

More importantly, Star Wars encapsulates a pop-culture tradition of space operas that can easily invent spaceships and robots and aliens, but that helplessly acquiesce to old, stereotypical treatments of gender and race. Why does that matter? Sci-fi is at least in part a dream of a different world and a different future. When that future unthinkingly reproduces current inequities, it seems like both a missed opportunity and a failure of imagination.

Trailer: The Giver.

 

Hrrrrrrrrrm.

Links!

• The 2014 Arthur C. Clarke Award shortlist has been released, and HEAVENS TO BETSY, THERE ARE A COUPLE OF LADIES ON IT.
• At the Guardian: Sofia Coppola to direct live-action Little Mermaid adaptation. And yes, they're going with the original, depressing, tragic-ass ending.
• Book trailer: William Shakespeare's Star Wars: The Empire Striketh Back!
• Lots of YA in the third Humble Bundle eBook Bundle, including Holly Black, Cory Doctorow, Scott Westerfeld, and the Zombies vs. Unicorns anthology.
• Speaking of good YA, dirt cheap: the Kindle version of Terry Farish's The Good Braider is $1.99 today.
• Mashable: The 25 Best Tumblr Accounts for Book Nerds.
• Yet another March Madness Event: the Tournament of Sidekicks. LAUNCHPAD MCQUACK!
• I really loved Midwinterblood, but Mac Barnett's takedown of it is hilarious. (And his reasoning is both sound and convincing.)
• Want a Doctor Who Lego set?
• New fave Pinterest board: Pointlessly Gendered Products. Fairy Hearts... SAUSAGES. Also, Diva vegetables. I don't even.

Trailer: The Maze Runner.

 

On Shailene Woodley and Twilight.

So, unless you're living under a rock—even I've heard about this one, and it was freaking TWO DEGREES here this morning—or you don't obsessively follow the YA news, you've heard about Divergent/Fault in Our Stars star Shailene Woodley's take on Twilight's central love story:

“Twilight, I’m sorry, is about a very unhealthy, toxic relationship. [The protagonist Bella] falls in love with this guy and the second he leaves her, her life is over and she’s going to kill herself! What message are we sending to young people? That is not going to help this world evolve.”

Which, really, is a pretty low-key statement. She doesn't insult fans of the franchise, she expresses an opinion about the source material. I'm less comfortable with her comment about sending the right "message", but it's a short quote, so I'm trying to avoid making the assumption that she's suggesting that YA fiction should carry specific messages. Because yuck.

Anyway, as you may expect, she's taking a decent amount of flack from Twilight fans:

@shailenewoodley your comments about Twilight? SHAME ON YOU. Most of the fandom of Twilight is supporting you! UNGRATEFUL

— kath (@AmadorKath) March 14, 2014

I don't think Shailene Woodley realizes how many fans she let down by her disrespectful comments towards Twilight.

— Robsten Is UnbRoKen (@krisbianhearted) March 13, 2014

To be fair, of course, she's also getting plenty of applause from the anti-Twilight faction:

go shailene woodley for recognizing that twilight is toxic

— viola eade (@queenlsa) March 12, 2014

Shailene Woodley said the truth about Twilight

— queen cappy (@QueenMcDimples) March 11, 2014

I find it interesting that so many people are taking her statement so personally... because she said NOTHING about the fans, the fandom, even about the quality of Meyer's writing or even of the movies. Disagreeing with someone, not liking the same things? That is not disrespect. She didn't say that people shouldn't like the book, she didn't say that people who like it are stupid or have bad taste, she didn't trivialize it by suggesting that romance stories are somehow lesser than other kinds of stories or that franchises with a largely female fanbase are silly.

The whole brouhaha is a perfect example of a larger issue that has way more bearing on the "evolution of the world" than Twilight: a disinclination towards, difficulty in having, a flat-out refusal to engage in rational discussion. Everything is black or white, right or wrong, red or blue, and if you disgree with one opinion that a person expresses, if that person doesn't share exactly the same value system or worldview that you do, well, to hell with her and everything else that she might ever say or do.

Ag. Now I'm all depressed and want to go back to bed.

_____________________________________________

ETA: Yes, I'm still thinking about this. Which is semi-ridiculous, probably, but as I'm a semi-ridiculous person, it's fitting. Anyway, it's also easy to draw parallels between the "if you don't like what I like, you're a mean jerk" mentality and the "people who indulge in literary criticism are haters" mentality. It's all tied in there together. Blerg.