Eighth-grader Theo Boone is a courtroom junkie. Both of his parents are lawyers, and Theo knows that eventually, he wants to work with the law -- he just doesn't know if he wants to be a lawyer or a judge. Until then, he has to content himself with attending as many trials as possible, giving legal advice to his classmates and giving guest lectures in his Government class.
Now, though, there's been a murder in wholesome Strattenburg, and due to a lack of evidence, the murderer is going to walk -- unless Theo Boone is able to find a way to protect the identity of a secret witness AND use said witness' testimony.
And there you have it: Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer.
So.
As you've probably already predicted, I want to punch this book in the face.
It didn't help that I had an attitude from minute one. The Bestselling Author Breaking Into The YA/J Market trend has been annoying from the first, and the TITLE is just... awful. But. I was willing to give both of those things a pass, because sometimes Bad Titles obscure Good Books, and sometimes Big Name Adult Authors do make a smooth transition into the YA/J world. And sometimes we even end up happy that they decided to wander over.
This time? Not so much.
The back cover promises "high intensity legal drama". Of those four words, only one is accurate: legal. There is very definitely no high intensity, and certainly no drama¹. Unless we're using drama as the opposite of comedy, in which case, I guess we could call it drama. A Lesson on the Ins and Outs of the Legal System would have been a more accurate description, but that's not going to get loads of people to snap a book up, regardless of age.
Readers who have become accustomed to middle grade crime fighters who are comfortable Taking Action (like our much-beloved Sammy Keyes) might be taken aback by the lack of actual Action on Theo's part -- the information pretty much falls into his lap and SPOILER Theo ultimately puts it all in the hands of the grown-ups, which is the most realistic solution, but leaves quite a lot to be desired, excitement-wise END SPOILER.
Theo Boone might work for readers who love Encyclopedia Brown but who are ready for something a bit longer -- though, if I'm remembering correctly (and I should be, considering I read them each 80 bazillion times), the Encyclopedia Brown books featured both more drama, more independent action from main character AND more trust in his own abilities from himself as well as from adults.
My issues:
Page 7:
"It wasn't a romance; they were too young for that. Theo did not know of a single thirteen-year-old boy in his class who admitted to having a girlfriend. Just the opposite. They wanted nothing to do with them. And the girls felt the same way. Theo had been warned that things would change, and dramatically, but that seemed unlikely."
I don't know what eighth graders John Grisham has been hanging around, but they clearly aren't from this planet. Also, it seemed like he was going for the Olde Fashionedy Children's Book Omniscient Storyteller voice, but it came across, to me, as irritating, condescending and inconsistent. Not to mention really fond of Telling, rather than Showing.
The irritating shows up throughout, but here's an example of the condescending nature of the voice. On page 19, about Theo's Government teacher: "He always addressed them as "men" and for thirteen-year-olds there was no greater compliment." Just... STOP IT. If there is no greater compliment -- WHICH I HIGHLY DOUBT -- than any thirteen-year-old reading it will already know that, and therefore, John Grisham, you don't have to spell it out for him. In addition to the condescending narrator, the adult characters tend towards Condescending Assiness as well, though I'm sure that an argument could be made for realism there.
The inconsistency also shows up throughout. The example that lines up with the Disinterest in Girls shows up a bit later:
Page 142:
"Hallie was distraught, in tears, and Theo couldn't help but notice how cute she was even when she was crying. It was a big moment for Theo."
Page 153:
""Why don't you call me sometime?" she asked.
Why? Now that was a good question. Probably because she was too busy talking to all the other boys. She changed boyfriends every other month. He'd never even thought of calling her.
"I'll do that," he said. Be he knew he wouldn't. He wasn't exactly looking for a girlfriend, and besides, April would be devastated if he began chasing a flirt like Hallie."
The narrator Tells the reader that Theo doesn't like girls, but then Theo's Behavior doesn't reflect that. Now, the bit on page 142 could just be a clumsy attempt at character development -- that's how I read the "It was a big moment for Theo", at any rate.
IF NOT FOR, AND ALSO, BUT.
The passage from page 153? About Hallie "changing boyfriends every month"? What's that all about? WHO ARE ALL OF THESE BOYFRIENDS, IF NONE OF THE BOYS ARE INTERESTED IN GIRLS? AND HOW OBNOXIOUSLY OLDE FASHIONEDY GRANDFATHERY² IS THE "A FLIRT LIKE HALLIE" line? What is this, the freaking 1920s? ALSO, IF NO ONE IS INTERESTED IN ROMANCE, WHY WOULD APRIL BE DEVASTATED?
I get what he was going for with the Theo/April relationship, I really do. But it wasn't consistent with what the narrator Told me. And so it added to the sloppy vibe.
Anyway, a similar issue arises in regards to Theo's relationship with his uncle. The narrator Informs us that Theo actively dislikes his uncle. And then there is nothing in their interaction that really backs that assertion up -- there are moments of irritation, sure, but nothing that supported the level of Theo's supposed negative feeling. AND, when Theo's got a problem, where does he go? Straight to his uncle. THAT. MAKES. NO. SENSE.
There was nothing in this book that suggested that we were dealing with an unreliable narrator, or even a sly one who'd say one thing while meaning the opposite -- so I was left feeling that the author just wasn't paying attention to what he was writing. Or that he assumed his audience wouldn't notice the ridiculousity of what he was throwing at them.
The story takes place in Strattenburg, a small city that I couldn't help but picture as Salem, the setting from Days of Our Lives -- because strangely, it's small enough that everyone seems to know each other, small enough that Theo smiles at AND IDENTIFIES every single person he sees on the way to the courthouse, but big enough to house a large courthouse, a pretty serious golf course and multiple gated communities, a large homeless population and a large population of illegal immigrants. It felt bizarrely like an idyllic childhood hometown that grew into a small city due to plot requirements.
Lastly -- and due to the fact that I dogeared almost EVERY SINGLE PAGE as an Annoyance Remembrance Aid, I could go on ad nauseum, but my lunchbreak is almost over and I really need to wind this up -- this last bit from pages 25-6 made me want to bang my head into a wall:
It was a bright class in a strong public school. Justin was by far the best athlete, though he couldn't swim as fast as Brian. Ricardo beat them all at golf and tennis. Edward played the cello, Woody the electric guitar, Darren the drums, Jarvis the trumpet, Joey had the highest IQ and made perfect grades. Chase was the mad scientist who was always a threat to blow up the lab. Aaron spoke Spanish, from his mother's side, German from his father's, and English, of course. Brandon had an early morning paper route, traded stocks online, and planned to be the first millionaire in the group.
Naturally, there were two hopeless nerds and at least one potential felon.
The class even had its own lawyer, a first for Mr. Mount.
Now, granted, this is probably a personal issue rather than a true literary issue, BUT. Was the nerd thing REALLY necessary? It just seems... mean-spirited. And kind of ridiculous, considering the fact that Theo, Mr. Mount's "star", always has his trusty laser pointer with him in case he's called on to give an impromptu lecture to the class: "Mr. Mount was known to be a bit slack with his class preparations on Fridays, and he needed Theo to fill in the gaps" (175). If THAT doesn't scream 'nerd' to most eighth grade boys, well... I guess I've lost touch.
Which is certainly possible.
But there seemed to be quite a lot of vaguely mean-spirited-ness towards any character who was, I dunno, outside of the wholesome white bread mainstream. (OTHER than the homeless kids who Theo tutors in English and their SPOILER illegal immigrant secret witness golf course employee cousin END SPOILER.) But Theo's uncle is kind of a hippie and he lost his license for sketchy lawyering, and his friend April's parents are GASP! "an eccentric antiques dealer" and a goat cheese-maker who apparently "torment" her.
Anyway. That kind of weirded me out.
VERDICT: AVOID. AVOID, AVOID, AVOID.
_________________________________________________
¹Even though the murderer has a hired thug who stares daggers at Theo ALL OF THE TIME. But NEVER ACTUALLY TAKES ANY SORT OF ACTION, SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CRAP HE WAS GETTING PAID FOR.
²Oh, speaking of: Theo's favorite television show? Perry Masonre-runs. I'm just sayin'.
I'm guessing that John Grisham hasn't been around a 13yo boy in say, the last 30 years?
I'm impressed that you managed to finish this. How many times did you throw it at the wall? ;)
Posted by: sassymonkey | 18 August 2010 at 04:36 PM
Thank you for taking one for the team, Leila, so I don't have to. I really don't like when authors don't take the time to research anything they are putting in their work. I read a book not too long ago where the main character was trying to get a horse to pull a Lassie and lead him to where his owner had been taken and I couldn't help but think the kid was going to be at it a long time.
Posted by: Jenn | 18 August 2010 at 04:47 PM
I don't know what eighth graders John Grisham has been hanging around, but they clearly aren't from this planet.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure my eighth-grade brother (AUGH! When did this happen?) has had a girlfriend for, like, a year.
Pshaw.
Posted by: Maureen E | 18 August 2010 at 04:51 PM
Icky. And why oh why must it be set in what sounds like an all boys school - would the girls contaminate the boys smarts or something?
Posted by: Jodie | 18 August 2010 at 05:30 PM
Jodie: I meant to mention that it's co-ed school, but with the sexes in separate classes. Ahem. From page 16: "During classes, they were "gender-separated," according to a new policy adopted by the smart people in charge of educating all the children in town."
God, this book was annoying.
Posted by: Leila | 18 August 2010 at 05:48 PM
I'm thinking he (or his agent or his pub or all them) just saw this as an easy way to make money/gain more acclaim. Every excerpt you have here shows sloppiness and that description of the classroom is crazy. As to the dating - I'm 41 and there were kids dating in my SIXTH grade class. (We called it "going out" back then even though no one went anywhere other than the movies with their parents driving.) By the 8th grade half the school was holding hands between classes. So Grisham can't blame it on his age - it's just sloppy, plain and simple.
I would have expected better from him and I certainly hope he doesn't get Edgars appreciation, etc. for this just because of who he is.
Posted by: colleen | 18 August 2010 at 07:12 PM
Well, the mystery aspect is crap, so he'd better as crap not get an Edgar nod for this one.
And that's all I trust myself to say at the moment, as I'm working on my third beer, and the entire Roy family is rather lightweighted.
Posted by: Leila | 18 August 2010 at 07:31 PM
I so do not understand how a 13 year old who is obsessed with law is not a nerd, let alone a kid with the highest IQ who made perfect grades. What exactly defines a nerd in Mr. Grisham's world? Also, that paragraph about the types in the class sounded like a logic problem. I fully expected the next paragraph to be about how many apples they each had in comparison to the others.
Posted by: Chrissy | 18 August 2010 at 07:34 PM
Yesssssssss!!! Now go read my review and Vicky Smith's Kirkus one --- a special full online one. They will affirm (not that you need it:) your feelings about this... this...thing.
Posted by: Monica Edinger | 18 August 2010 at 07:39 PM
Blerg. As I avoid the reviews until I read the book, I am SO glad that I was not alone in disliking this one.
Posted by: Leila | 18 August 2010 at 07:54 PM
OMG. I couldn't love this anymore. Thank you. You'll be happy to know parents and grandparents have not been buying this book. I've only had two customers ask about it. Both times I quickly shook my head no and showed them another book.
I love when bad adult author ( writing it for the easy money) crossover books tank.
Posted by: Doret | 18 August 2010 at 08:36 PM
Theo's a robot. he has no hormones.
The thing that annoyed me the most was where, near the end, the "bad guy" working for the alleged murderer is shadowing Theo, wondering what he's doing..... and then nothing ever happens. Nothing. Here's the perfect build up for at least a chase scene. And it doesn't happen. The threatening tough guy just kind of goes away. Lame.
Posted by: Apaperbackwriter.blogspot.com | 18 August 2010 at 08:40 PM
Not that I was in danger of picking this up, but... the excerpts you posted were positively nauseating. And the oldest THREE of my nephews (the oldest being 14) have been getting girlfriends for 3-4 years now.
Posted by: Julie | 18 August 2010 at 10:24 PM
As a middle school teacher, I can guarantee you that the vast majority of a middle schooler's day is spent thinking about boyfriends/girlfriends. I just hope to break through those hormones once in a while to teach them about the wonderful world of grammar.
Posted by: chandie | 18 August 2010 at 11:10 PM
Chrissy, I thought the same thing about the logic problem! Gah! This book sounds horrible!
Posted by: Loretta Ross | 18 August 2010 at 11:31 PM
Also, I haven't read the book so I'm just using your quotes, but are there no girls in his class? Or do they just not do anything interesting enough to get a mention in the "bright" class list?
Posted by: sara | 19 August 2010 at 02:04 AM
I am suspicious that the girls are off secretly learning how to sew and getting etiquette lessons now, then at the end being fed five real facts to quote if anyone asks them. But maybe that's just my conspiracy brain.
I so glad you read this book so I don't have to (and usually I probably would anyway just to see how annoying it was, but this one I think I'll AVOID) :)
Posted by: Jodie | 19 August 2010 at 02:24 AM
Oh, Leila! Darling! You threw yourself on yet another grenade for me!!!
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Now, we'll go scrape up your guts and maybe mail them to this condescending, sneering MORON of a writer...
Posted by: tanita | 19 August 2010 at 07:19 AM
"Hallie was distraught, in tears, and Theo couldn't help but notice how cute she was even when she was crying. It was a big moment for Theo."
Nice compassion there from Theo! So glad to see yet another female character whose importance hinges on how she makes the male character ~feel~.
Posted by: Danielle | 19 August 2010 at 07:53 AM
Danielle: Ha ha ha ha ha! Wow. I was so busy being frustrated with my issues with the WRITING that that didn't even occur to me -- and you are, of course, totally right! That's just... terrible.
Posted by: Leila | 19 August 2010 at 08:11 AM
Excellent job, Leila. Not that I was planning to read this . . . but your review is hilarious and wonderful!
Posted by: Kate | 19 August 2010 at 09:42 AM
QUOTE: "...I dogeared almost EVERY SINGLE PAGE as an Annoyance Remembrance Aid..."
Annoyance Rememberance Aid? OMG, you crack me up.
Is it wrong to say I'm sort of glad it sucks? Sure, MG boys need more books, but why do "famous" adult book authors get paid huge advances for mediocre work? Surely there are authors reading your post right now who really understand that demographic and know how to write for it, but can't get an agent let alone published. It makes me sad.
Posted by: reader and writer | 20 August 2010 at 04:22 PM
I'm sure it will add to the joy when I point out that I read a quote from the author in which he said he wrote this book because he wanted to beat J.K. Rowling's sales figures. He seemed offended that a mere children's book author had sold so many books.
Of course, I had the same reaction to Theodore Boone that you did--loved your examples! (I reviewed it not long ago and made a list of failings, too.) Don't forget the way the plot didn't actually resolve. Though the cliffhanger ending was more like stepping off a curb, stumbling a bit, and feeling irritated about it.
Posted by: Kate Coombs | 26 August 2010 at 08:52 AM
Seriously - are there even any Perry Mason episodes in syndication now? I mean, back in 1985, it seemed like a big deal when I was excluded from the Perry Parties my parents had (now THERE are a couple of nerds for you!), but I can't imagine 13 year olds now have even HEARD of Perry Mason. The parents of most 13 year olds were likely teenagers when the made-for-TV movies were out. MY parents were kids when the original TV series was on. And I'm 29.
I wasn't actually at risk of reading this, but I'm still so happy to have your review. For its sheer entertainment value, if nothing else.
Posted by: Kimberly (lectitans) | 19 November 2010 at 12:24 PM
So I'm skimming through blogs about the only sad excuse for a John Grisham I could find at my highschool library and I found this. Amazingly I agree with every word on this page right from the confusing character analysis to the overall misleading feeling of "Yay, another Grisham book I haven't read!". Props to you for exposing this book online to possibly save this horrible economy we live in from getting any worse. And I'm 16.
Posted by: Alex Womack | 06 December 2010 at 10:19 PM
wat i dont lik about this is tht john never said who april was goin' with was it the mom or dad??? if i were her i would want to stay with theo for how nice a friend he is to her......
Posted by: Aurora | 22 October 2011 at 10:38 PM
I am so glad I have found someone who hates this as much as I do!
Posted by: Ruby | 29 December 2011 at 06:08 PM
I had to read this book for an english class and it was SOOOOO dissatisfying. I would rather try to deal with keeping track of characters and intertwining plots than read this junk again. I enjoy Grisham's other books, but writing a book for money? PATHETIC
I'm 14 by the way
Posted by: Jake | 18 January 2012 at 07:59 PM
That was good! I mean I really enjoyed reading your review. Why should Grisham want to do that? We loved his earlier legal thrillers and he already has his niche readers! Why did he want to compete with Rowling? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/7819397/John-Grisham-Im-going-to-catch-Harry-Potter-one-way-or-another.html
Stick to your adult fiction Mr Grisham!
Posted by: Geetha | 30 August 2012 at 02:27 AM
First of all, This book is amazing. Don't listen to this bullshit that this chick is telling you. Go read it for yourself. I am 24 years old and my little brother that is 13 says that it is an amazing book also. I've read almost all of john grishams books and they are amazing too. So get of the computer fat asses and read!
Posted by: Fart bung | 12 December 2012 at 11:41 AM
I agree with Fart Bung the book is amazing. None of the complaints are legitament. In the eighth grade you go through "puberty" and begin to like girls even if you dont want to like them. Were you in eighth grade if so not in the 21th century. Youre what 42 and your reading a book towards 10-14 year olds. Go read 50 shades of grey.
Posted by: Big al | 26 March 2013 at 09:41 PM
Wow. Heteronormative much?
Posted by: Sarah | 27 March 2013 at 05:16 PM
Just read this book and wanted to scream at the top of my lungs at HOW BAD IT IS. yikes. No way it would get out of a slush pile without famous name attached to it. Makes me want to barf. And the sloppy narration with the Point of View rambling all over the place and all the telling instead of showing and the way it uses stereotypes all over the place... I could go on and on and on just like he has by sequels to this. argh! And Perry Mason and Barney Fife allusions would just not fly with anyone in the target audience!
Posted by: Sandra Havriluk | 30 June 2013 at 11:10 PM
Omg I love this book series!! Ever hears of keeping rude comments to yourself?!! Well bet you didn't cause you are just being down right RUDE!!
Posted by: Kalie | 26 November 2013 at 04:20 PM